Search "user:Legit-Lobster"

Yes, that one is broken. It's also rated negative so it should be removed soon.

No, it's completely appropriate. High level puzzles are for people who are good at tactics. If you are good at tactics, you should be able to calculate a mate in 3. That's not hard.

Also, that is a fairly easy and straightforward mate.

the puzzles are generated automatically.

bumping this extremely important issue

But it turns chess (at least partially) into a game of luck. I don't think lichess will add the variant because of that.

I don't think that's particularly balanced. It's very easy to randomly get a worse starting position this way. Basically, it's 960 with a handicap for one side. There's a reason why in tabletops you a…

The side who chooses second yould counter the opponent's setup and would be at an advantage. It's only viable, I think, if pieces are placed in turns. There is some depth potentially in setting up you…

Yes I know but it's tedious and it will still heavily favor one or at most two lines in 90% of games. It needs to randomly choose from book moves or there has to be a random variable implemented that …

I want to play the highest computer difficulty. I don't want to play the french defense 98% (literally) of the time after 1.e4. The other 1.9% are 1.e5 and the rest 1.c5. Please tweak the opening play…